[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8D57F8.1050106@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:04:40 +0200
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, romieu@...zoreil.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WAN: bit and/or confusion
Fix the tests that check whether Frame* bits are not set
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
>> - else if (!(skb->data[pkt_len] | ~(FrameVfr | FrameRab)))
>> + else if (!(skb->data[pkt_len] & (FrameVfr | FrameRab)))
>> dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
>
> This test requires both FrameVfr and FrameRab to be true (zero). Perhaps
> it should be:
>
>> + else if ((skb->data[pkt_len] & (FrameVfr | FrameRab)) != FrameVfr | FrameRab)
Ok, Francois Romieu, could you test this?
>> else
>> dev->stats.rx_errors++;
>
> rx_errors is incremented only on remaining errors. I think most drivers
> increment rx_errors on all RX errors, and simultaneously rx_*_errors
> when needed.
>
>
> Perhaps something like the following should be better?
>
> u8 status = ~skb->data[pkt_len];
>
> if (status == 0)
> looks_good...;
> else {
> if (status & FrameRab)
> ...
> if (status & FrameVfr)
> ...
> etc.
> rx_errors++;
> }
I don't understand your suggestion - why status == 0? doesn't the patch
below do what you want instead?
Roel
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c b/drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c
index 8face5d..88534b6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c
@@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ static inline void dscc4_rx_skb(struct dscc4_dev_priv *dpriv,
} else {
if (skb->data[pkt_len] & FrameRdo)
dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors++;
- else if (!(skb->data[pkt_len] | ~FrameCrc))
+ else if (!(skb->data[pkt_len] & FrameCrc))
dev->stats.rx_crc_errors++;
- else if (!(skb->data[pkt_len] | ~(FrameVfr | FrameRab)))
+ else if ((skb->data[pkt_len] & (FrameVfr | FrameRab)) !=
+ FrameVfr | FrameRab)
dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
- else
- dev->stats.rx_errors++;
+ dev->stats.rx_errors++;
dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
}
refill:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists