netdev - Re: [PATCH,v2] Re: e1000e: why does pci_enable_pcie_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:06:12 +0200
From:	Jens Rosenboom <jens@...one.net>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc:	Danny Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,v2] Re: e1000e: why does
 pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() fail on my hp2510p?

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:48 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
[...]
> @@ -5301,9 +5296,6 @@ static void __devexit e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  	/* AER disable */
>  	err = pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pdev);
> -	if (err)
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -		        "pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting failed 0x%x\n", err);
>  
>  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  }

While you're at it, why don't you also remove the "err =" here, which
allows you to drop the variable from that function completely? This
applies to all three *_remove() functions.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html