lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908250054.50664.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:54:50 +0300
From:	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
To:	"Jan-Bernd Themann" <themann@...ibm.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>
Subject: TSecr != 0 check in inet_lro.c


Hi,

We are seeing a performance issue with TSO/LRO which we tracked down to the 
TSecr !=0 check in lro_tcp_ip_check.

It happens when the LRO side's TSval wraps around and gets to 0. That triggers 
the TSO side to send packets with TSecr set to 0, which means that such 
packets won't be aggregated - and that will put a lot of burden on the stack 
which will result in lots of drops.

I'm failing to understand the purpose of this check. Any hints? :)

Thanks,
tavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ