netdev - Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A941AA6.5070506@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:08:54 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
	Nivedita Singhvi <niv@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?

Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>>> The initial point was that the SNMP counters are not updated if IP_RECVERR
>>> is not set which is clearly a bug and your and my patch addresses that.
>> Technically speaking, the send() syscall is in error. Frame is not sent, so
>> there is no drop at all. Like trying to send() from a bad user buffer, or write()
>> to a too big file...
> 
> Frame is submitted to the IP layer which discards it. That is the
> definition of an output discard.
> 

Last patch accounts for this *error* AFAIK, or did I missed something ?


>> Question is : should we just allow send() to return an error (-ENOBUF) regardless
>> of IP_RECVERR being set or not ? I dont think it would be so bad after all.
>> Most apps probably dont care, or already handle the error.
> 
> Some applications will then start to fail because so far you can send with
> impunity without getting errors. AFAICT IP_RECVERR was added to preserve
> that behavior. Your patch is changing basic send() semantics.

Sorry ???, I guess your machines have plenty available LOWMEM then, and kmalloc() never fail then...

man P send

      ENOBUFS
              Insufficient resources were available in the system to perform the operation.

basic send() semantics are respected.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html