netdev - Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:15:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org, niv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	sri@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, David Stevens wrote:

> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote on 08/25/2009 06:48:24
> AM:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>
> > > If we count these drops as qdisc drops, should we also count them as
> IP OUTDISCARDS?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Actually, no. (!)
>
> IP_OUTDISCARDS should count the packets IP dropped, not
> anything dropped at a lower layer (which, in general, it
> is not aware of). If you count these in multiple layers,
> then you don't really know who dropped it.

You are right. I skipped that IP OUTDICARDS reference. They need to be
accounted at the qdisc level though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html