[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826194835.GA16508@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:48:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
billfink@...dspring.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, brice@...i.com,
gallatin@...i.com
Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:08:30 +0200
>
> > Sigh, no. Please re-read the past discussions about this.
> > trace_skb_sources.c is a hack and should be converted to generic
> > tracepoints. Is there anything in it that cannot be expressed in
> > terms of TRACE_EVENT()?
>
> Neil explained why he needed to implement it this way in his reply
> to Steven Rostedt. I attach it here for your convenience.
thanks. The argument is invalid:
> > BTW, why not just do this as events? Or was this just a easy way
> > to communicate with the user space tools?
>
> Thats exactly why I did it. the idea is for me to now write a
> user space tool that lets me analyze the events and ajust process
> scheduling to optimize the rx path. Neil
All tooling (in fact _more_ tooling) can be done based on generic,
TRACE_EVENT() based tracepoints. Generic tracepoints are far more
available, have a generalized format with format parsers and user
tooling implemented, etc. etc.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists