[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251295175.14241.11.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:59:35 -0400
From: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>,
Michael B??ker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Reduce looping in the interrupt handler.
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 09:56 -0400, David Dillow wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 00:58 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
> > index 3b19e0c..2214945 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
>
> > +
> > + /* Ignore the parts of status that reflect more than
> > + * the enabled interrupts.
> > + */
> > + smp_rmb();
> > + if (!(status & tp->intr_mask & tp->intr_event))
> > + break;
> > }
>
> This looks like an odd construct, since we're just about to go back the
> while condition up top -- why not just mask it here and let the loop
> handle it naturally?
Never mind, I see what you are doing -- avoiding a false loop if we get
status == 0xffff. I still don't like the aesthetics of it, but it makes
sense, and I'll blame it on the card. :)
I should really get some caffeine before posting...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists