[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090827092841.GC4260@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:28:41 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nhorman@...driver.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, billfink@...dspring.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, brice@...i.com, gallatin@...i.com
Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:58:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry you got that impression, but you are a maintainer
> > yourself so you might perhaps understand it why sooner or later,
> > if a maintainer's review does not get acted upon, one has to
> > insist on clean patches in stronger terms.
>
> Cool down a bit :) [...]
Hello Pot, Kettle here ;-)
I guess i'll have to test the limits of your patience by queueing up
some bad commit into fs/libfs.c via say the iommu tree, without acks
and with commit log damage, which patch then triggers a build
failure and a crash in linux-next (like this one did), and refuse to
revert and not do anything substantial about your (initially polite)
review feedback for 2 weeks (like it happened here), and see how
measured your response will be after the 12th mail that gets faced
with such passive-aggressive inaction ;-)
At that point, will your wall of patience finally start to crumble a
tiny bit and will you resort to using the taboo term 'crappy patch'
perhaps, like i did here? ;-)
Anyway, as Steve said it's now finally water under the bridge, time
to move on.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists