[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A97F852.6060505@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:31:30 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-mm@...ck.org, hpa@...or.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, s.hetze@...ux-ag.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread,
> which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and
> export to modules.
Michael, Andrew,
I am just curious: Is there any technical reason why a kthread cannot
have a long-term use_mm() in effect? (Assuming this makes sense for the
design, of course). For the cases there we know the kthread will always
service the same context (such as with venettap/vhost, it may make sense
to do a use_mm() at init time and just leave it until the thread exits.
Will this break anything?
Kind Regards,
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists