[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090828.130309.225603635.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: sri@...ibm.com, dlstevens@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, niv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: UDP multicast packet loss not reported if TX ring overrun?
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:53:42 -0400 (EDT)
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, David Miller wrote:
>
>> If you start incrementing tx_dropped here, people won't be able
>> to tell they have a deteriorating cable or bad switch or similar.
>
> ?? The patch does not do that. That was extra stuff not covered by the
> patch.
Yes you did, you put a device tx_dropped counter bump into
qdisc_drop().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists