[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090828223626.GA8283@ioremap.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:36:26 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, alan@...ux.intel.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] task_struct: add PF_NONOTIFY for fanotify to use
Hi.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:55:42PM -0400, Eric Paris (eparis@...hat.com) wrote:
> Since fanotify opens file descriptors inside the kernel for it's listeners
> it needs a way to make sure that 2 fanotify listeners, both which listen to
> open events do not continuously see each others open events (and get into a
> livelock reporting on each other's activity). This fix is to create a new
> tast_struct flags called PF_NONOTIFY. If this flag is set in a task no
> fanotify events will be generated for that task. fanotify will set the
> flag before and open call and will clear it immediately after.
Is there a way to get old-school notifications with the object
information instead of opened file desriptor, which may suffer rlimit
problems and scalability issues with too many opened/closed descriptors?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists