[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831093019.GI5005@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc()
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
>
> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
> sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling.
Thanks everyone,
Jarek P.
> cases sk_free() is called earlier, usually after other alloc errors.
>
> Fix is to move sk_wmem_alloc initialization from sock_init_data()
> to sk_alloc() itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index bbb25be..7633422 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family, gfp_t priority,
> sk->sk_prot = sk->sk_prot_creator = prot;
> sock_lock_init(sk);
> sock_net_set(sk, get_net(net));
> + atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
> }
>
> return sk;
> @@ -1872,7 +1873,6 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
> */
> smp_wmb();
> atomic_set(&sk->sk_refcnt, 1);
> - atomic_set(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc, 1);
> atomic_set(&sk->sk_drops, 0);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_init_data);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists