[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090902.230954.227402492.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers: Kill now superfluous ->last_rx
stores
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:34:50 +0200
> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> Neil Horman a écrit :
>>> I still see a large number of drivers that update dev->last_rx, although its
>>> not all as I look through the list, so something definately seems amiss.
>>
>> Some drivers still update dev->last_rx for their own needs, not a core
>> network concern.
>>
>> But a cleanup is certainly possible on few other drivers, about a dozen
>> if I count correctly.
>
> Well, a litle bit more if we look outside of drivers/net
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers: Kill now superfluous ->last_rx stores
>
> The generic packet receive code takes care of setting
> netdev->last_rx when necessary, for the sake of the
> bonding ARP monitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Applied, thanks Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists