[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020909031248s56c16205j7992930c413b1bbe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:48:10 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, "stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Fix kmem_cache_destroy() with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Here is the second patch (RCU thing). Stable candidate
>
> [PATCH] slub: Fix kmem_cache_destroy() with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
>
> kmem_cache_destroy() should call rcu_barrier() *after* kmem_cache_close()
> and *before* sysfs_slab_remove() or risk rcu_free_slab()
> being called after kmem_cache is deleted (kfreed).
>
> rmmod nf_conntrack can crash the machine because it has to
> kmem_cache_destroy() a SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU enabled cache.
Do we have a bugzilla URL for this?
> Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
OK, this is in for-next now and queued for 2.6.31. If you guys want to
fix this in a different way, lets do that in 2.6.32.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists