[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090903.201131.194103894.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] vlan: adds drops accounting
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:39:16 +0200
> Its hard to tell if vlans are dropping frames, since
> every frame given to vlan_???_start_xmit() functions
> is accounted as fully transmitted by lower device.
>
> We can test dev_queue_xmit() return values to
> properly account for dropped frames.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Applied.
But, how inappropriate would it be to keep doing the accounting
but pass the status back to the caller? Or will that screw up
the qdisc running engine?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists