| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090904193810.46543e3c@nehalam> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:38:10 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wan: dlci/sdla transmit return dehacking On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:48:50 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote: > Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> writes: > > > This is a brute force removal of the wierd slave interface done for > > DLCI -> SDLA transmit. Before it was using non-standard return values > > and freeing skb in caller. This changes it to using normal return > > values, and freeing in the callee. Luckly only one driver pair was > > doing this. Not tested on real hardware, in fact I wonder if this > > driver pair is even being used by any users. > > The only hardware which seems to be driven by dlci.c is sdla.c = > old Sangoma ISA cards. > > Sangoma seems to maintain their own drivers for their hw (including > these ISA cards). > > Are the in-kernel drivers functional after all those years? I don't > know. In the Vyatta product we use the Sangoma drivers, so we actually have to make and not configure in the existing WAN drivers. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists