lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090907125025.GB2914@psychotron.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Sep 2009 14:50:26 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, fubar@...ibm.com,
	bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: introduce primary_passive option

Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:56:21PM CEST, nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr wrote:
> Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> (updated)
>>
>> In some cases there is not desirable to switch back to primary interface when
>> it's link recovers and rather stay with currently active one. We need to avoid
>> packetloss as much as we can in some cases. This is solved by introducing
>> primary_passive option. Note that enslaved primary slave is set as current
>> active no matter what.
>>
>> This patch depends on the following one:
>> [net-next-2.6] bonding: make ab_arp select active slaves as other modes
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/32684/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt b/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
>> index d5181ce..e70fa8e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
>> @@ -614,6 +614,17 @@ primary
>>   	The primary option is only valid for active-backup mode.
>>  +primary_passive
>> +
>> +	Specifies the behaviour of the primary slave in case of
>> +	it's link recovery has been detected. By default (value 0) the
>> +	primary slave is set as active slave immediately after the link
>> +	recovery. If the value is 1 or 2 then current active slave doesn't
>> +	change as long as it's link status doesn't change. This prevents
>> +	the bonding device from flip-flopping. Plus if the value is 1 this
>> +	behaviour happens only if the speed and duplex of primary slave is
>> +	higher. It the value is 2 then it happens everytime.
>> +
>
> May I suggest the following option name and description instead ?
>
> -----
>
> primary_return
>
> 	Specifies the behavior of the current active slave when the primary was
> 	down and comes back up. This option is designed to prevent flip-flopping
> 	between the primary slave and other slaves. The possible values and
> 	their respective effects are:
>
> 	alway or 0 (default)
>
> 		The primary slave becomes the active slave whenever it comes
> 		back up.
>
> 	better or 1
>
> 		The primary slave becomes the active slave when it comes back
> 		up, if the speed and duplex of the primary slave is better
> 		than the speed and duplex of the current active slave.
>
> 	failure_only or 2
>
> 		The primary slave becomes the active slave only if the current
> 		active slave fails and the primary slave is up.
>
> 	When no slave are active, if the primary comes back up, it becomes the
> 	active slave, regardless of the value of primary_return.
>
> -----
>
> Then, to allow those logical names, I suggest you use the 
> bond_parse_parm() function and the following constants and struct, to 
> parse module params and sysfs configuration.
>
> enum {
>         BOND_PRI_RETURN_ALWAYS = 0,
>         BOND_PRI_RETURN_BETTER = 1,
>         BOND_PRI_RETURN_FAILURE_ONLY = 2,
> };
>
> const struct bond_parm_tbl bond_pri_return_tbl[] = {
> {       "always",         BOND_PRI_RETURN_ALWAYS},
> {       "better",         BOND_PRI_RETURN_BETTER},
> {       "failure_only",   BOND_PRI_RETURN_FAILURE_ONLY},
> {       NULL,           -1},
> };
>
> 	Nicolas.

Ok, I like this, but I would stay rather with Jay's suggestion to call this
option primary_passive. Seems more accurate to me.

I'm going to repost soon.

Jirka
>
>>  updelay
>>   	Specifies the time, in milliseconds, to wait before enabling a
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 699bfdd..65066c1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static int downdelay;
>>  static int use_carrier	= 1;
>>  static char *mode;
>>  static char *primary;
>> +static int primary_passive;
>>  static char *lacp_rate;
>>  static char *ad_select;
>>  static char *xmit_hash_policy;
>> @@ -126,6 +127,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(mode, "Mode of operation : 0 for balance-rr, "
>>  		       "6 for balance-alb");
>>  module_param(primary, charp, 0);
>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(primary, "Primary network device to use");
>> +module_param(primary_passive, int, 0);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(primary_passive, "Do not set primary slave active once it comes up; "
>> +			       "0 for off (default), 1 for on only if speed of primary is not higher, 2 for on");
>>  module_param(lacp_rate, charp, 0);
>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(lacp_rate, "LACPDU tx rate to request from 802.3ad partner "
>>  			    "(slow/fast)");
>> @@ -1070,6 +1074,25 @@ out:
>>   }
>>  +static bool bond_should_loose_active(struct bonding *bond)
>> +{
>> +	struct slave *prim = bond->primary_slave;
>> +	struct slave *curr = bond->curr_active_slave;
>> +
>> +	if (!prim || !curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (bond->force_primary) {
>> +		bond->force_primary = false;
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>> +	if (bond->params.primary_passive == 1 &&
>> +	    (prim->speed < curr->speed ||
>> +	     (prim->speed == curr->speed && prim->duplex <= curr->duplex)))
>> +		return false;
>> +	if (bond->params.primary_passive == 2)
>> +		return false;
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>>   /**
>>   * find_best_interface - select the best available slave to be the active one
>> @@ -1094,7 +1117,8 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
>>  	}
>>   	if ((bond->primary_slave) &&
>> -	    bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
>> +	    bond->primary_slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP &&
>> +	    bond_should_loose_active(bond)) {
>>  		new_active = bond->primary_slave;
>>  	}
>>  @@ -1675,8 +1699,10 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, 
>> struct net_device *slave_dev)
>>   	if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && bond->params.primary[0]) {
>>  		/* if there is a primary slave, remember it */
>> -		if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0)
>> +		if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0) {
>>  			bond->primary_slave = new_slave;
>> +			bond->force_primary = true;
>> +		}
>>  	}
>>   	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>> @@ -4942,6 +4968,18 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
>>  		primary = NULL;
>>  	}
>>  +	if (primary) {
>> +		if ((primary_passive != 0) && (primary_passive != 1) &&
>> +		    (primary_passive != 2)) {
>> +			pr_warning(DRV_NAME
>> +				   ": Warning: primary_passive module parameter "
>> +				   "(%d), not of valid value (0/1/2), so it was "
>> +				   "set to 0\n",
>> +				   primary_passive);
>> +			primary_passive = 0;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (fail_over_mac) {
>>  		fail_over_mac_value = bond_parse_parm(fail_over_mac,
>>  						      fail_over_mac_tbl);
>> @@ -4973,6 +5011,7 @@ static int bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
>>  	params->use_carrier = use_carrier;
>>  	params->lacp_fast = lacp_fast;
>>  	params->primary[0] = 0;
>> +	params->primary_passive = primary_passive;
>>  	params->fail_over_mac = fail_over_mac_value;
>>   	if (primary) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> index 6044e12..e813d48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
>> @@ -1212,6 +1212,59 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(primary, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>>  		   bonding_show_primary, bonding_store_primary);
>>   /*
>> + * Show and set the primary_passive flag.
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t bonding_show_primary_passive(struct device *d,
>> +					    struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +					    char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", bond->params.primary_passive);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t bonding_store_primary_passive(struct device *d,
>> +					     struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +					     const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	int new_value, ret = count;
>> +	struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
>> +
>> +	if (!rtnl_trylock())
>> +		return restart_syscall();
>> +
>> +	if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &new_value) != 1) {
>> +		pr_err(DRV_NAME
>> +		       ": %s: no primary_passive value specified.\n",
>> +		       bond->dev->name);
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +	if (new_value == 0 || new_value == 1 || new_value == 2) {
>> +		bond->params.primary_passive = new_value;
>> +		pr_info(DRV_NAME ": %s: Setting primary_passive to %d.\n",
>> +		       bond->dev->name, new_value);
>> +		if (new_value == 0 || new_value == 1) {
>> +			bond->force_primary = true;
>> +			read_lock(&bond->lock);
>> +			write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>> +			bond_select_active_slave(bond);
>> +			write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
>> +			read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		pr_info(DRV_NAME
>> +		       ": %s: Ignoring invalid primary_passive value %d.\n",
>> +		       bond->dev->name, new_value);
>> +	}
>> +out:
>> +	rtnl_unlock();
>> +	return count;
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(primary_passive, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>> +		   bonding_show_primary_passive, bonding_store_primary_passive);
>> +
>> +/*
>>   * Show and set the use_carrier flag.
>>   */
>>  static ssize_t bonding_show_carrier(struct device *d,
>> @@ -1500,6 +1553,7 @@ static struct attribute *per_bond_attrs[] = {
>>  	&dev_attr_num_unsol_na.attr,
>>  	&dev_attr_miimon.attr,
>>  	&dev_attr_primary.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_primary_passive.attr,
>>  	&dev_attr_use_carrier.attr,
>>  	&dev_attr_active_slave.attr,
>>  	&dev_attr_mii_status.attr,
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> index 6290a50..b6287e0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct bond_params {
>>  	int lacp_fast;
>>  	int ad_select;
>>  	char primary[IFNAMSIZ];
>> +	int primary_passive;
>>  	__be32 arp_targets[BOND_MAX_ARP_TARGETS];
>>  };
>>  @@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ struct bonding {
>>  	struct   slave *curr_active_slave;
>>  	struct   slave *current_arp_slave;
>>  	struct   slave *primary_slave;
>> +	bool     force_primary;
>>  	s32      slave_cnt; /* never change this value outside the attach/detach wrappers */
>>  	rwlock_t lock;
>>  	rwlock_t curr_slave_lock;
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ