netdev - Re: BUG UNIX: Poison overwritten with 2.6.31-rc6-00223-g6c30c53

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AA64A11.7090804@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:01 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jike Song <albcamus@...il.com>
CC:	Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG UNIX: Poison overwritten with 2.6.31-rc6-00223-g6c30c53

Jike Song a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> We decrement a refcnt while object already freed.
>>
>> (SLUB DEBUG poisons the zone with 0x6B pattern)
>>
>> You might add this patch to trigger a WARN_ON when refcnt >= 0x60000000U
>> in sk_free() : We'll see the path trying to delete an already freed sock
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
>> index 7633422..1cb85ff 100644
>> --- a/net/core/sock.c
>> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
>> @@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ static void __sk_free(struct sock *sk)
>>
>>  void sk_free(struct sock *sk)
>>  {
>> +       WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) >= 0x60000000U);
>>        /*
>>         * We substract one from sk_wmem_alloc and can know if
>>        * some packets are still in some tx queue.
>>
>>
> 
> The output of dmesg with this patch appllied is attached.
> 
> 

Unfortunatly this WARN_ON was not triggered,
maybe freeing comes from sock_wfree()

Could you try this patch instead ?

Thanks

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 7633422..30469dc 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ static void __sk_free(struct sock *sk)

 void sk_free(struct sock *sk)
 {
+	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) >= 0x60000000U);
 	/*
 	 * We substract one from sk_wmem_alloc and can know if
 	* some packets are still in some tx queue.
@@ -1220,6 +1221,7 @@ void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
 	int res;

+	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) >= 0x60000000U);
 	/* In case it might be waiting for more memory. */
 	res = atomic_sub_return(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
 	if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_USE_WRITE_QUEUE))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html