netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] pktgen update for net-next (2.6.32)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19110.31505.134937.813631@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:41:05 +0200
From:	robert@...julf.net
To:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
Cc:	robert@...julf.net, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@....uu.se>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] pktgen update for net-next (2.6.32)



On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, robert@...julf.net wrote:
>>
>> Sending different pkt-sizes at maxrate using one CPU-core (of eight)
>> with ixgbe driver and Intel's 82598 chip.
>>
>>      w. patch
>> 64    4761904    3846153

>I can also measure a performance improvement.

> Generator machine, AMD Phenom 9950 quad core, using a 10GbE Intel 82599 
> NIC (6 port 10GbE from Hotlava Systems Inc.).

> With patches:
> -------------
> tx_pkt_sz: 64  TX-pps: 9426724

Impressive. 82599 seems fast. Didn't you report even higher number
with other CPU's?

Cheers
					--ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html