[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AAA774F.2050209@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:14:07 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, s.hetze@...ux-ag.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
Gregory Haskins wrote:
[snip]
>
> FWIW: VBUS handles this situation via the "memctx" abstraction. IOW,
> the memory is not assumed to be a userspace address. Rather, it is a
> memctx-specific address, which can be userspace, or any other type
> (including hardware, dma-engine, etc). As long as the memctx knows how
> to translate it, it will work.
>
citations:
Here is a packet import (from the perspective of the host side "venet"
device model, similar to Michaels "vhost")
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ghaskins/alacrityvm/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=kernel/vbus/devices/venet-tap.c;h=ee091c47f06e9bb8487a45e72d493273fe08329f;hb=ded8ce2005a85c174ba93ee26f8d67049ef11025#l535
Here is the KVM specific memctx:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ghaskins/alacrityvm/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=kernel/vbus/kvm.c;h=56e2c5682a7ca8432c159377b0f7389cf34cbc1b;hb=ded8ce2005a85c174ba93ee26f8d67049ef11025#l188
and
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ghaskins/alacrityvm/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=virt/kvm/xinterface.c;h=0cccb6095ca2a51bad01f7ba2137fdd9111b63d3;hb=ded8ce2005a85c174ba93ee26f8d67049ef11025#l289
You could alternatively define a memctx for your environment which knows
how to deal with your PPC boards PCI based memory, and the devices would
all "just work".
Kind Regards,
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists