[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090911.121542.45333246.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, gregory.v.rose@...el.com,
donald.c.skidmore@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] igb: Use Intel OUI for VF MAC addresses
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:02:43 -0700
> On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 19:07 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:48:27 -0700
>> Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
>> > From: Gregory Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
>> > This patch changes the default VF MAC address generation to use an Intel
>> > Organizational Unit Identifier (OUI), instead of a fully randomized
>> > Ethernet address. This is to help prevent accidental MAC address
>> > collisions.
>
> I think this not a very good idea.
>
>> How can probability of collision be lower when the address space
>> is smaller? If you are going to use Intel OUI, then you should constrain
>> the selection to a portion of that space that is not being used
>> by other hardware. I.e if you know Intel assigns addresses to their
>> devices in ranges, choose a range that is not in use.
>
> Some other possibilities might be:
I also completely agree that this patch is not a wise move.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists