[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f2db9d90909141952r7ee9a4aj1d5e0dcdbceba111@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:52:48 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...taire.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Fischer, Anna" <anna.fischer@...com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: L2 switching in igb
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...taire.com> wrote:
> To have VEPA support another bit has to be programmed... its the one that
> doesn't let the PF to forward a packet to a VF whose source mac matches the
> one in the packet (e.g multicast sender).
The bit I was referring to not setting would handle that. By
disabling the DTXSWC local loopback bit the PF will not send anything
to the VFs or visa versa.
> Yes, lets do that. I'd like to suggest that a "VF programmable from user
> space" context will contain a <mac, vlan-id, priority-bits, rate> tuple,
> such that in the absence of vlan tag, the VF driver will "sign" the packet
> (skb) with vlan-id and priority-bits assigned by the admin and the PF NIC
> will mandate that the VF originated traffic will not exceed the rate.
Well whenever I can get to it I will try to add that support. In the
meantime I believe there is a BOF session covering "Virtual Ethernet
switch enhancements and configuration" at the Linux Plumbers Conf that
will cover some of this so hopefully we can come up with a solid plan
on how to address this.
Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists