[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB1FE6E.9000201@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:16:30 +0800
From: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, pekkas@...core.fi, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Milgram <mmilgram@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4: make do_ip_setsockopt for IP_MULTICAST_IF support
ip_mreq struct
Xiaotian Feng wrote, at 09/17/2009 01:20 PM:
> ip_mreq and ip_mreqn is almost the same, and do_ip_setsockopt for IP_MULTICAST_IF
> part supported ip_mreqn struct. This patch adds support for ip_mreq struct.
>
It's not meaning to support the ip_mreq struct, the imr_multiaddr member
never be used by the IP_MULTICAST_IF.
In addition, using the option normally like this:
struct in_addr interface_addr;
setsockopt (socket, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_IF, &interface_addr, sizeof(interface_addr));
Do your patch suggest using the option like this?
struct ip_mreq mreq;
setsockopt (socket, IPPROTO_IP, IP_MULTICAST_IF, &mreq, sizeof(mreq));
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists