[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090920095242.5cd42f1a@pundit>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:52:42 +0200
From: Christopher Zimmermann <madroach@...web.de>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SO_TIMESTAMPING fix and design decisions
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:09:21 -0700
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com> wrote:
> > hardware timestamps only work for the Intel igb driver. I have
> > access to two test machines with NICs supported by this driver.
>
> Intel's 82599, supported by ixgbe, also has the same IEEE 1588
> timestamping support in hardware. We haven't implemented the support
> yet in ixgbe, but the hardware is there and does work. If you were
> curious of the interface, the datasheet for the hardware is available on
> our SourceForge site (e1000.sf.net).
hi! thanks for the reply.
I already got the documentation for the 82576 cards I have access to. I
won't be able to afford another pair.
What do you think about my idea to expose the relevant registers to
userspace? I believe it would not be too difficult for userspace to
configure the timestamps this way and would allow way more flexibility.
Of course I would #DEFINE the constants used to set the registers.
Christopher Zimmermann
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists