netdev - Re: r8169, enabling TX checksumming breaks things?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200909231724.23132.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:24:23 +0300
From:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
Cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169, enabling TX checksumming breaks things?

On Wednesday 23 September 2009 17:02:24 David Dillow wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 09:15 +0300, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is it expected that:
> > 1)TX checksumming is off by default
> > 2)If i try to enable it over ethtool -K eth0 tx on , TCP sessions on
> > proxy getting stuck, even in tcpdump looks everything fine and packets
> > reaching destination, i don't understand what is a reason of failure.
> > Maybe if this feature supposed to not work - user must not be able just
> > to turn it on?
>
> It is broken for large swaths of the hardware -- I have patches that got
> it and TSO working on my hardware, and they provide a framework to see
> about getting it working on yours.
>
> Basically, the fields are in different places depending on the chip
> revision. I'll try to dig those out tonight and send them along so we
> can experiment.
Thanks, i have 8 hosts (4 hosts with RTL8168b/8111b. and 4 with 
RTL8168d/8111d) to test. Ready for patches to test them :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html