[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253721097.2890.3.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:51:37 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"alan@...ux.intel.com" <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: fanotify as syscalls
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 13:32 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:39:33 +0100
> Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com> wrote:
>
> > Lived with it because there was no other option. We used LSM while it
> > was available for modules but then it was taken away.
>
> ... at which point you could have submitted your LSM module for
> inclusion... you'd be the first (and only?) Anti Virus vendor that
> would be in the mainline kernel.. speaking of competitive advantage,
> coming out of the box in all distributions.
And users would be left in a situation between choosing an LSM which
actually does in provable ways increase security and using an AV
scanner. Until magic solves the LSM stacking problem (it's been tried,
no magic) I don't think any distro wants AV vendors as LSMs.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists