netdev - Re: [PATCH] ems_pci: fix size of CAN controllers BAR mapping for CPC-PCI v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ABB2FBF.8080906@grandegger.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:37:19 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:	Sebastian Haas <haas@...-wuensche.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ems_pci: fix size of CAN controllers BAR mapping for
 CPC-PCI	v2

Hi Sebastian,

Sebastian Haas wrote:
> The driver mapped only 128 bytes of the CAN controller address space when a
> CPC-PCI v2 was detected (incl. CPC-104P). This patch will fix it by always
> mapping the whole address space (4096 bytes on all boards) of the
> corresponding PCI BAR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Haas <haas@...-wuensche.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c |    8 +++++---
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c
> index 7d84b8a..ba98063 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/ems_pci.c
> @@ -94,12 +94,14 @@ struct ems_pci_card {
>  #define EMS_PCI_CDR             (CDR_CBP | CDR_CLKOUT_MASK)
>  
>  #define EMS_PCI_V1_BASE_BAR     1
> -#define EMS_PCI_V1_MEM_SIZE     4096
> +#define EMS_PCI_V1_MEM_SIZE     4096 /* size of PITA control area */
>  #define EMS_PCI_V2_BASE_BAR     2
> -#define EMS_PCI_V2_MEM_SIZE     128
> +#define EMS_PCI_V2_MEM_SIZE     128 /* size of PLX control area */
>  #define EMS_PCI_CAN_BASE_OFFSET 0x400 /* offset where the controllers starts */
>  #define EMS_PCI_CAN_CTRL_SIZE   0x200 /* memory size for each controller */
>  
> +#define EMS_PCI_CONTR_MEM_SIZE  4096 /* size of controller area */
> +
>  static struct pci_device_id ems_pci_tbl[] = {
>  	/* CPC-PCI v1 */
>  	{PCI_VENDOR_ID_SIEMENS, 0x2104, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,},
> @@ -266,7 +268,7 @@ static int __devinit ems_pci_add_card(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  		goto failure_cleanup;
>  	}
>  
> -	card->base_addr = pci_iomap(pdev, base_bar, mem_size);
> +	card->base_addr = pci_iomap(pdev, base_bar, EMS_PCI_CONTR_MEM_SIZE);
>  	if (card->base_addr == NULL) {
>  		err = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto failure_cleanup;

I see. To avoid confusion I suggest renaming some variables and defines:

s/EMS_PCI_V1_MEM_SIZE/EMS_PCI_V1_CONF_SIZE/
s/EMS_PCI_V2_MEM_SIZE/EMS_PCI_V2_CONF_SIZE/
s/mem_size/conf_size/
s/EMS_PCI_CONTR_MEM_SIZE/EMS_PCI_BASE_SIZE/

Would that not be more appropriate?

Wolfgang.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html