netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfg80211: fix wireless handlers assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909272237190.4098@sister.anvils>
Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:50:03 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cfg80211: fix wireless handlers assignment

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> I've experimented by moving your NETDEV_PRE_INIT hunk later in the
> sequence, just before the netdev_initialize_kobject(dev) (so I also
> changed the "goto out" to "goto err_uninit"): both* machines then boot
> correctly, and this mail leaves me wirelessly.
> 
> I'll now experiment to see how early I can move that hunk.

Both machines boot (and do wireless) correctly with your NETDEV_PRE_INIT
hunk placed just after the ndo_init block, instead of just before where
you placed it.  That's i386 kernels on both.

But curiouser and curiouser... the laptop can do 64-bit, so I built
my 64-bit kernel, and went through the motions to reproduce the
early boot crash with the patch as you had it: but the x86_64 kernel
boots (and does wireless) correctly with the NETDEV_PRE_INIT hunk
just where you placed it, before the ndo_init block.

Perhaps there's a difference in the 32- and 64-bit startup sequence
with respect to notifiers; or perhaps your change tickles another bug.
I don't know, I'm turning off now.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html