[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090929142538.GA10180@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:25:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Evgeny Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connector: Fix sid connector (was: Badness at
kernel/softirq.c:143...)
On 09/29, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger (borntraeger@...ibm.com) wrote:
> > Ok, can confirm that this patch fixes my problem, but I am not sure if the
> > intended behaviour is still working as expected.
>
> Your patch breaks assumption that task_session(current->group_leader) is
> not equal to new session id,
Afaics, no.
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1090,6 +1090,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(setsid)
> struct pid *sid = task_pid(group_leader);
> pid_t session = pid_vnr(sid);
> int err = -EPERM;
> + int send_cn = 0;
>
> write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> /* Fail if I am already a session leader */
> @@ -1104,12 +1105,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(setsid)
>
> group_leader->signal->leader = 1;
> __set_special_pids(sid);
> + if (task_session(group_leader) != sid)
> + send_cn = 1;
This is not right, task_session(group_leader) must be == sid after
__set_special_pids().
And I don't think "int send_cn" is needed. sys_setsid() must not
succeed if the caller lived in session == task_pid(group_leader).
Or I missed your point?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists