[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091001.131424.157091984.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ethtool: Add reset operation
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:43:15 +0100
> After updating firmware stored in flash, users may wish to reset the
> relevant hardware and start the new firmware immediately. This should
> not be completely automatic as it may be disruptive.
>
> A selective reset may also be useful for debugging or diagnostics.
>
> This adds a separate reset operation which takes flags indicating the
> components to be reset. Drivers are allowed to reset only a subset of
> those requested, and must report the actual subset. This allows the
> use of generic component masks and some future expansion.
This looks fine to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists