netdev - Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate estimators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC51D3D.8010700@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:21:01 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate   estimators

David Miller wrote, On 10/01/2009 11:14 PM:

> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:05:53 +0200
> 
>> Since you ask... I wonder about this whole int plus quite a bit of
>> struct unreadability for one flag only. Maybe it could be queried
>> on qdisc level (with a flag if necessary), and additional parameter
>> of gnet_stats_copy_rate_est()? (Qdiscs should have no problem with
>> setting this param for their classes too.)
> 
> Certainly, that's another approach to this problem.
> 
> But logically, just like we wouldn't emit a block of RED scheduler
> data to 'tc' unless RED is actually configured, it seems consistent to
> not emit estimator data when no estimator is even there.

Sure! I've exaggerated with this additional parameter. ;-)

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html