netdev - Re: [1/8,RFC] CAIF Protocol Stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC9ECD4.70602@babic.homelinux.org>
Date:	Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:55:48 +0200
From:	Stefano Babic <stefano.babic@...ic.homelinux.org>
To:	sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kim.xx.Lilliestierna@...csson.com
Subject: Re: [1/8,RFC] CAIF Protocol Stack

sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com wrote:

> diff --git a/include/linux/caif/caif_ioctl.h b/include/linux/caif/caif_ioctl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4fdd648
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/caif/caif_ioctl.h

[snip]

> +/**
> + * union caif_action
> + * This union is used to configure a new CAIF Channel and
> + */
> +
> +union caif_action {
> +	struct caif_device_name delete_channel;
> +	struct caif_channel_create_action create_channel;
> +};

It seems this structure is defined twice (here and in caif_actions.h)
and some modules (at least phyif_ser, I could check) are not compiled
clean, because both header files are included. Maybe should be protected
with ifndef __KERNEL__ ?

Regards,
Stefano

-- 
stefano <stefano.babic@...ic.homelinux.org>
GPG Key: 0x55814DDE
Fingerprint 4E85 2A66 4CBA 497A 2A7B D3BF 5973 F216 5581 4DDE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html