netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] bonding: allow previous slave to be used when re-balancing traffic on tlb/alb interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091006162731.GC1639@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:27:31 -0400
From:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bonding: allow previous slave to be used when
	re-balancing traffic on tlb/alb interfaces

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 03:43:33AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:13:57 -0700
> 
> > 	Andy, I've been doing some further testing with this patch, and
> > I'm seeing some panics that I believe are related to this patch.  It
> > appears that the last_slave isn't cleared (or isn't cleared soon enough)
> > when a slave is released, and concurrent transmit activity is getting
> > into alb_get_best_slave() and finding a last_slave pointer that is stale
> > (points to no slave currently on the slave list).
> 
> I'm holding off on these 3 bonding patches until this is resolved.
> --

Sounds good, Dave.

I was hoping to get this resolved yesterday, but got distracted.  I will
have some time today.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html