netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 03/15] igb: update the approach taken to acquiring and releasing the phy lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091006.152053.184470362.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 03/15] igb: update the approach taken to
 acquiring and releasing the phy lock

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:07 -0700

> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> 
> The current approach is just using a ?: type mechanism to set the phy
> locking bit.  This if fine for now but limits us to only 2.  Switch to a
> nested if statement for future compatiblity with more than 2 phys.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html