[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACCF90D.6080005@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:24:45 +0200
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH net-next-2.6] bonding: remove useless
assignment
Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote:
> The variable old_active is first set to bond->curr_active_slave.
> Then, it is unconditionally set to new_active, without being used in between.
>
> The first assignment, having no side effect, is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian@...e.fr>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Resent after fixing tab to space corruption.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index a7e731f..fce7233 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
> int i;
>
> - new_active = old_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
> + new_active = bond->curr_active_slave;
>
> if (!new_active) { /* there were no active slaves left */
> if (bond->slave_cnt > 0) /* found one slave */
Apparently still some issues with patch formating. I will investigate this and post later.
Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists