lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0a09e5c0910071459r2768f420lae87f7404dfbc054@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2009 14:59:49 -0700
From:	Andrew Grover <andy.grover@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: using huge numbers of queues

Hi Herbert,

At NetConf, you made a passing remark about wanting lots of queues,
even 1-per-socket. Have you thought further about how we would use so
many?

Thinking about this reminded me of VJ's 2006 netchannel concept, which
although not adopted, was pretty interesting. Would having 1 queue per
socket (or at least 1 per process) and hw that is able to filter
individual flows (I think the Intel 82599 can do this now for up to
128) perhaps make netchannels workable? At least this would get all
processing out of int/bh and into process context, if not userspace,
no?

Regards -- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ