[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091007.031957.197632672.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: atis@...rotik.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, panther@...abit.hu, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
brian.haley@...com, zenczykowski@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add sk_mark route lookup support for IPv4 listening
sockets, and for IPv4 multicast forwarding
From: Atis Elsts <atis@...rotik.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:46:34 +0300
> @@ -1238,6 +1238,7 @@ static void ipmr_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct mfc_cache *c, int vifi)
>
> if (vif->flags&VIFF_TUNNEL) {
> struct flowi fl = { .oif = vif->link,
> + .mark = skb->mark,
> .nl_u = { .ip4_u =
> { .daddr = vif->remote,
> .saddr = vif->local,
I'm not so sure if this is right.
I understand what you're trying to do, inherit the socket's
mark when it goes over a multicast tunnel.
But I'm not so sure that's what we want to do, semantically.
Could you split out these skb->mark cases into a seperate
patch? The parts that only use sk->mark are fine and I
would like to apply a patch from you which just does that
while we discuss the skb->mark case.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists