netdev - Re: using huge numbers of queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:02:22 +0900
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Andrew Grover <andy.grover@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using huge numbers of queues

On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 02:59:49PM -0700, Andrew Grover wrote:
> 
> Thinking about this reminded me of VJ's 2006 netchannel concept, which
> although not adopted, was pretty interesting. Would having 1 queue per
> socket (or at least 1 per process) and hw that is able to filter
> individual flows (I think the Intel 82599 can do this now for up to
> 128) perhaps make netchannels workable? At least this would get all
> processing out of int/bh and into process context, if not userspace,
> no?

This is exactly right.  Having one socket per queue would allow
the netchannel concept to become reality without compromising
features such as netfilter.

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html