[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACFC8AA.7010902@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:35:06 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"billfink@...dspring.com" <billfink@...dspring.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netconf notes and materials
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:51 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
>>From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
>>Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:49:49 -0400
>>
>>
>>>How did you do the NUMA memory performance monitoring that was
>>>presented on one of your slides?
>>
>>Using proprietary internal tools Intel is unlikely to release.
>>
>>On the bright side, some of those metrics will make their way into the
>>'perf' facilities in the kernel so they can be monitored, but not all
>>of them.
>
>
> Yes, they are tools written by our CPU and chipset teams to assist in
> debug. To reinforce what David just said, I know Jesse Barnes is
> working hard with the Intel powers-that-be to get the "approved" public
> PMU counters into the perf utility. I'd imagine the PMU counters for
> IOH memory throughput will be deemed ok, since it's not uncovering any
> IP.
>
> If I hear anything about any of the performance counters, I'll be sure
> to forward that on.
From the standpoint of I/O, anything that might enable a port of:
http://pcitop.berlios.de/
would be goodness.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists