[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910121715.35676.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:15:35 +0300
From: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel mode pppoe ppp if + ifb + mirred redirect, ethernet packets in ifb?!
How it can be ethernet packets (with PPPoE headers) if i am redirecting from
ppp interface, not ethernet interface?
PPPoE_146 ~ # tcpdump -ni ppp0 -e -vvv -s 1500 -c 4
tcpdump: WARNING:
tcpdump: listening on ppp0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size
1500 bytes
17:03:17.015598 Out ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 68: (tos 0x0, ttl 111, id
45623, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52)
68.231.189.241.24800 > 172.16.131.199.1060: Flags [.], cksum 0xd208
(correct), seq 783840165, ack 1980178761, win 32748, options [nop,nop,sack 1
{1441:8741}], length 0
PPPoE_146 ~ # tcpdump -ni ifb0 -e -vvv -s 1500 -c 4
tcpdump: WARNING:
tcpdump: WARNING: ifb0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: listening on ifb0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 1500
bytes
17:04:01.625547 00:0a:cd:17:5e:08 > 00:0a:cd:14:6b:67, ethertype PPPoE S
(0x8864), length 70: PPPoE [ses 0xb] IP (0x0021), length 50: (tos 0x0, ttl
128, id 51706, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 48)
Btw i test, if i use userspace pppoe (synchronous) i will get different output
in tcpdump
PPPoE_146 ~ # tcpdump -ni ifb0 -vvvv
tcpdump: WARNING:
tcpdump: WARNING: ifb0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: listening on ifb0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
17:15:41.512553 00:28:00:d6:40:00 > ff:03:00:21:45:00, ethertype Unknown
(0x8006), length 44:
0x0000: df49 ac10 8320 cf2e 1c51 0416 0050 ce7b .I.......Q...P.{
0x0010: e177 1caf 491d 5010 ffff 7afe 0000 .w..I.P...z...
17:15:41.520802 00:34:00:d7:40:00 > ff:03:00:21:45:00, ethertype Unknown
(0x8006), length 112:
0x0000: df3c ac10 8320 cf2e 1c51 0416 0050 ce7b .<.......Q...P.{
0x0010: e177 1caf 491d 8010 ffff 686e 0000 0101 .w..I.....hn....
0x0020: 050a 1caf 4ebd 1caf 545d ff03 0021 4500 ....N...T]...!E.
0x0030: 0034 00d8 4000 8006 df3b ac10 8320 cf2e .4..@....;......
0x0040: 1c51 0416 0050 ce7b e177 1caf 491d 8010 .Q...P.{.w..I...
0x0050: ffff ..
17:15:41.528825 00:34:00:d9:40:00 > ff:03:00:21:45:00, ethertype Unknown
(0x8006), length 56:
0x0000: df3a ac10 8320 cf2e 1c51 0416 0050 ce7b .:.......Q...P.{
0x0010: e177 1caf 491d 8010 ffff 5d2e 0000 0101 .w..I.....].....
0x0020: 050a 1caf 4ebd 1caf 5f9d ....N..._.
With PPTP it is as expected, IP packets (like in ppp interface tcpdump).
On Monday 12 October 2009 16:10:47 jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:43 +0300, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> > Is it expected that redirecting ppp interface, that supposed to be clean
> > IP traffic is becoming eth encapsulated traffic?
>
> No. Imagine if there were other types of packets non-ip for example,
> what do you do then?
> this feature is as close as you can get when you do switch level
> mirroring or redirection. If you want to edit header before redirect
> etc, use pedit (refer to recent discussion with someone who wanted to
> replicate packets for redundant routing purposes);
>
> cheers,
> jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists