[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012174528.GB22736@nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:45:28 -0400
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
Narendra_K@...l.com, jordan_hargrave@...l.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Network Device Naming mechanism and policy
Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) said:
> > Today, port naming is completely nondeterministic. If you have but
> > one NIC, there are few chances to get the name wrong (it'll be eth0).
> > If you have >1 NIC, chances increase to get it wrong.
>
> That is why all distros name network devices based on the only
> deterministic thing they have today, the MAC address. I still fail to
> see why you do not like this solution, it is honestly the only way to
> properly name network devices in a sane manner.
>
> All distros also provide a way to easily rename the network devices, to
> place a specific name on a specific MAC address, so again, this should
> all be solved already.
No, it's not solved. Even if you have persistent names once you install,
if you ever re-image, you're likely to get *different* persistent names;
the first load will always be non-detmerministic.
The only way around this would be to have some sort of screen like:
Would you like your network devices to be enumerated by
[ ] MAC address
[ ] PCI device order
[ ] Driver name
[ ] Other
which is just all sorts of fail in and of itself. Especially since
once you get to the point where you can coherently ask this in a
native installer, the drivers have already loaded.
Bill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists