[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255457182.2196.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:06:22 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: Bill Nottingham <notting@...hat.com>
Cc: Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Narendra K <narendra_k@...l.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, jordan_hargrave@...l.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Network Device Naming mechanism and policy
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 13:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Scott James Remnant (scott@...ntu.com) said:
> > On the other hand, they *tend* to be unique for a wide range of systems.
> > This makes them pretty comparable to LABELs on disks, and we have
> > a /dev/disk/by-label
> >
> > Remember that udev already supports symlink stacking, and priorities and
> > such.
> >
> > I don't think there's any danger of supporting a /dev/netdev/by-mac by
> > default, it'll be a benefit to most and those who don't have unique MACs
> > will just ignore it.
>
> At the moment, we do not appear to get the proper change uevents from things
> like 'ip link set dev <foo> address <bar>', so we can't currently maintain
> these symlinks.
And if we really want seamless support for MAC spoofing, we want
ETHTOOL_GPERMADDR for all drivers too, so that if your configuration
says "rename device XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX to YY:YY:YY:YY:YY:YY" we can
actually figure stuff out after the spoof.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists