netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] gianfar: Add support for hibernation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091013.120912.186003446.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	afleming@...escale.com
Cc:	avorontsov@...mvista.com, dai.haruki@...escale.com,
	scottwood@...escale.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] gianfar: Add support for hibernation

From: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:22:38 -0500

> No, it was fine (though made unnecessary by other patches).  The BD
> has a union:
> 
>                 struct {
>                         u16     status; /* Status Fields */
>                         u16     length; /* Buffer length */
>                 };
>                 u32 lstatus;
> 
> so when you write "lstatus", you need to use the BD_LFLAG() macro, but
> when you write "status", you are just setting the status bits.

Indeed I missed that, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html