[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091013.001106.226276168.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: w@....eu
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:07:06 +0200
> But in tcp_minisocks.c, this counter is only checked. And in
> fact, I have found no location which updates it. So I think
> that what was intended was to decrease it in tcp_minisocks
> whenever it is checked, which the trivial patch below does :
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> index f8d67cc..1b443b0 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept &&
> TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
> + inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept--;
> inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
> return NULL;
> }
>
> Is there anything I am missing ?
Your logic looks sound and I can't come to any other conclusion
after going over this code, even going back to 2.4.x
Feel free to make a formal patch submission, thanks Willy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists