netdev - Re: [PATCH] x25: bit and/or confusion in x25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091013.034724.44299172.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	roel.kluin@...il.com
Cc:	linux-x25@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?

From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:59:42 +0200

> Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended
> and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.
> 
> In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
> was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>

Looks good to me, applied to net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html