[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C19A7559-6C48-4F2D-8052-529DC63F046E@ntop.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:34:53 +0200
From: Luca Deri <deri@...p.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Brad Doctor <brad.doctor@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PF_RING: Include in main line kernel?
Ben
the patch implements what I looked for.
Thanks Luca
On Oct 14, 2009, at 11:27 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 10/14/2009 01:36 PM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Luca Deri (deri@...p.org)
>> wrote:
>>> The reason why I decided to patch dev.c is because I wanted
>>> PF_RING to
>>> decide whether the packet journey shall continue or not. In other
>>> words with my solution PF_RING applications can decide whether the
>>> received packets will also be delivered to upper layers (and to
>>> other
>>> kernel network components). This configurable 'early packet drop'
>>> allows the overall performance to be significantly increased as
>>> received packets are not supposed to be delivered to upper layers;
>>> this is a typical situations for many monitoring devices.
>>
>> This is a feature many projects implement themself indeed. What about
>> creating special return value from the packet handler which will
>> indicate that packet was already consumed and no further work
>> should be
>> done on it?
>
> Maybe something similar to the attached patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
>
> <patch0.patch>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists