[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091013191003.9778c4bb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:10:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@...mni.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/hamradio: fix test in receive()
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:20:08 +0200 Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> The negation makes it a bool before the comparison and hence it
> will never evaluate to true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> Was this intended?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_epp.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_epp.c
> index 7bcaf7c..ee06a13 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_epp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_epp.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,8 @@ static int receive(struct net_device *dev, int cnt)
> state = 0;
>
> /* not flag received */
> - else if (!(bitstream & (0x1fe << j)) != (0x0fc << j)) {
> + else if ((bitstream & (0x1fe << j)) !=
> + (0x0fc << j)) {
> if (state)
> do_rxpacket(dev);
> bc->hdlcrx.bufcnt = 0;
It does look like that is what was intended.
With this fix we're turning on a code path which probably hasn't been
executed by anyone in a decade or so. I wonder what it'll do?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists