netdev - Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: use dev_dbg, fix build for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910151553.17203.dtor@vmware.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:53:17 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
To:	pv-drivers@...are.com
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: use dev_dbg, 
 	fix build for CONFIG_BLOCK=n

On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:47:48 pm Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:42:49 pm Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Bhavesh Davda wrote:
> > > Who ever compiles with CONFIG_BLOCK=n? Just kidding...
> >
> > or why does networking need CONFIG_BLOCK at all?  ;)
> >
> > > Thanks again for making this change! Ship it!
> >
> > So could I have used adapter->netdev->dev or adapter->pdev->dev ?
> > either of them?  are they the same?
> 
> They are the same.
> 

Hmm.. I take this back, adapter->netdev->dev.parent == adapter->pdev->dev.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html