netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] net: Use sk_tx_queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:17:10 +0530
From:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] net: Use sk_tx_queue_mapping for connected sockets

Hi Eric,

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote on 10/16/2009 07:37:30 PM:

> > I wait for tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock to finish and create a connection.
> > sk_setup_caps/__sk_dst_set are called for the new socket resulting
> > in sk_dst_cache getting set (I cannot set the cache till the
> > connection is finished and dst is set). I guess that means that I
> > will wait for another skb to come and the response will use skb_tx_hash
> > instead of using the rx recorded.
>
> Well, I see no relation between rx mapping and tx mapping currently.

You are suggesting an enhancement to assign the txq# at ack processing
using the skb->rx#. As you said it will help cards that are hashing the
rx# internally. I will try that separately after this patch.

> > Will this suffice, but if not, is it something I should handle or an
> > add-on patch should do instead?
> >
>
> Your patch is fine, I was only giving ideas for future patches :)

Thanks for the suggestions, I just wanted to make sure.

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html