netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] page allocator: Direct reclaim should always obey watermarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910161204140.21328@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
	reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org\"" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] page allocator: Direct reclaim should always obey
 watermarks

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:

> ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS should be cleared when trying to allocate from the
> free-lists after a direct reclaim. If it's not, __GFP_NOFAIL allocations
> from a process that is exiting can ignore watermarks. __GFP_NOFAIL is not
> often used but the journal layer is one of those places. This is suspected of
> causing an increase in the number of GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures reported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index dfa4362..a3e5fed 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1860,7 +1860,8 @@ rebalance:
>  	page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
>  					zonelist, high_zoneidx,
>  					nodemask,
> -					alloc_flags, preferred_zone,
> +					alloc_flags & ~ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS,
> +					preferred_zone,
>  					migratetype, &did_some_progress);
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_pg;

I don't get it.  __alloc_pages_high_priority() will already loop 
indefinitely if ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS is set and its a __GFP_NOFAIL 
allocation.  How do we even reach this code in such a condition?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html